Introduction – AI Chips for Every Scale
Artificial intelligence workloads are pushing the limits of computer chips, from data centers training large language models (LLMs) to personal devices running on-device AI. In response, chipmakers have designed specialized processors tailored for AI. This post compares some of the latest standout chips in both enterprise and consumer realms – NVIDIA’s H100, AMD’s Instinct MI300 series, Intel’s Gaudi3, and Apple’s M3 – examining how each improves AI processing. We’ll start with a high-level overview for developers and tech enthusiasts, then dive into technical details and benchmarks. By the end, you’ll understand each chip’s strengths in model training, inference performance, memory bandwidth, and software ecosystem, with real-world examples like training giant LLMs or running generative AI on a laptop.
NVIDIA H100 – Hopper Architecture for Extreme AI Performance
NVIDIA’s H100 Tensor Core GPU is an enterprise-grade AI accelerator built on the Hopper architecture. It delivers an order-of-magnitude leap in performance over its predecessor (A100) by introducing new features like fourth-generation Tensor Cores and the Transformer Engine for FP8 precision (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog). Each H100 packs 80 GB of HBM3 memory (the SXM5 module) with a massive 3 TB/s bandwidth, roughly double that of the previous generation (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog). This high-speed memory feeds nearly 16,000 CUDA cores and specialized units, enabling the H100 to perform matrix math operations at unprecedented rates – up to 4× the throughput of A100 when using the new 8-bit FP8 format for deep learning (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog).
AI Training: In model training, the H100 currently stands as the industry leader. Its raw compute (~1 PFLOP of FP16/BF16) and fast interconnects (NVLink4 and NVSwitch) allow scaling to hundreds or thousands of GPUs for parallel training (Breaking MLPerf Training Records with NVIDIA H100 GPUs | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (Breaking MLPerf Training Records with NVIDIA H100 GPUs | NVIDIA Technical Blog). For example, NVIDIA demonstrated an LLM training run that achieved 89% scaling efficiency across 3,584 H100 GPUs, completing the job in just 10.9 minutes (Breaking MLPerf Training Records with NVIDIA H100 GPUs | NVIDIA Technical Blog). Even in smaller setups, an 8× H100 server (DGX H100) can train models significantly faster than previous GPUs. In one MLPerf test, BERT (a popular NLP model) was trained to target accuracy in only 8 seconds using 3,072 H100s (Breaking MLPerf Training Records with NVIDIA H100 GPUs | NVIDIA Technical Blog) – highlighting how H100 enables record-breaking training times.
AI Inference: The H100 is also optimized for serving trained models with low latency. Thanks to the Transformer Engine and TensorRT software optimizations, H100 can execute Transformer models in 8-bit precision without losing accuracy (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog). In practical terms, a DGX H100 (8 GPUs) can handle over 5 queries per second of a Llama-2 70B language model when configured with a 2.5-second response time budget (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog). Even with no batching (single-query, minimal latency), the DGX system can generate a 70B model’s response in about 1.7 seconds (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog). These numbers illustrate the high throughput and low latency H100 delivers for large-scale inference workloads. For smaller models or higher batch sizes, the throughput scales even further, often measured in tens of thousands of images or tokens processed per second in benchmarks (NVIDIA Data Center Deep Learning Product Performance AI Inference) (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor …).
Memory and Compute: With 80 GB HBM3 at 3 TB/s, H100 can hold sizable models or batches in memory and feed its compute units efficiently (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog). Its theoretical compute reaches ~990 TFLOPs (dense FP16) or ~1,980 TFLOPs with structured sparsity (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators), plus dedicated support for TF32, INT8, and FP8. This raw power means H100 can tackle everything from precision-demanding HPC tasks to throughput-oriented deep learning. It also features new DPX instructions to accelerate algorithms like genomics alignment and route optimization by up to 7× (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog), broadening its usefulness beyond neural nets. In short, NVIDIA’s H100 is built to be a universal AI workhorse – excelling at both training and inference – backed by the robust CUDA software stack and libraries that have become industry-standard.
(image) Figure: NVIDIA H100 SXM5 module (GPU at center) with surrounding HBM3 memory. With 80GB of HBM3 delivering >3 TB/s bandwidth, H100 feeds its 4th-gen Tensor Cores for up to 4× higher AI throughput at 8-bit precision compared to the prior A100 (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog).
AMD Instinct MI300 – Generative AI Accelerator with Massive Memory
AMD’s Instinct MI300 series is AMD’s answer to the demand for large-scale AI and HPC acceleration, and the flagship MI300X is especially geared toward generative AI workloads. Architecturally, MI300X is a multi-chip module using the 5nm CDNA 3 GPU architecture. It combines 8 compute chiplets (XCD) with a huge pool of unified memory: 8 stacks of HBM3 memory on-package (Testing AMD’s Giant MI300X). This gives each MI300X a whopping 192 GB of HBM3 with up to 5.3 TB/s bandwidth (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator) (Testing AMD’s Giant MI300X) – by far the largest memory capacity on a single AI accelerator today. This design is tailored for very large models that wouldn’t fit in 40–80GB GPUs. In fact, AMD notes that a single MI300X can hold models on the order of 70–150 billion parameters (at FP16 precision) entirely in memory, avoiding the complexity of splitting across multiple GPUs (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). For example, a 66B parameter model (like OPT-66B) requiring ~145 GB can run on one MI300X, whereas NVIDIA’s 80GB cards would need to partition that model across multiple GPUs (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators).
AI Training: The MI300X is poised to compete in high-end training tasks, boasting enormous math throughput. Its chiplet design yields a total of 304 compute units (38 CUs × 8 dies) with Matrix Cores for tensor operations (Testing AMD’s Giant MI300X). The GPU’s theoretical peak is about 1.3 PFLOPs FP16/BF16 (dense), or 2.6 PFLOPs with sparsity, which actually edges out the H100’s listed FP16 capability (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). In practice, this means MI300X has the raw horsepower to train large neural networks and the memory to keep them on-chip. It targets use cases like multi-billion parameter transformer models, where memory bandwidth and capacity can be the limiting factors. For instance, in HPC environments MI300A (a variant with integrated CPU + GPU and 128GB HBM3) will power the El Capitan supercomputer, indicating its suitability for large-scale distributed training and simulation workloads.
AI Inference: Generative AI inference (serving models) is where MI300X’s memory advantage really shines. Big language models (GPT-3, PaLM, etc.) can be loaded with less slicing across devices. This can reduce latency and simplify scaling for deployment. AMD’s testing shows models up to 175B parameters (GPT-3) can be served with as few as 3 MI300X GPUs working together, thanks to the 192GB per card (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). The 5.3 TB/s memory bandwidth also means these huge models can be fed to the compute units efficiently, sustaining high token throughput. AMD directly targets use cases like LLM inference and generative AI in datacenters – during the MI300X reveal, AMD touted it as a “leadership performance” solution for GPT-style workloads and other AI models (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator) (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator). While official inference benchmarks (like MLPerf) for MI300X are still forthcoming, AMD has hinted that when software is optimized, MI300X can achieve competitive or superior inference performance. (Notably, an AMD demo compared MI300X to an H100 system on Llama-2, which NVIDIA later responded to by showing H100 could double that performance with optimized code (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog) – indicating MI300X is at least in the same class as the H100 for LLM inference.)
Memory and Ecosystem: The headline feature of MI300X is clearly memory. 192 GB HBM3 @ 5.3 TB/s is a generational leap, aimed at removing memory bottlenecks for both AI and HPC (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator). This giant memory (augmented by a 256 MB last-level “Infinity Cache”) lets MI300X run models that literally require terabytes of data – one MI300X platform with 8 GPUs has a combined 2 TB HBM3E capacity and 48 TB/s aggregate bandwidth (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). On the software side, AMD’s ecosystem has historically lagged NVIDIA’s, but they are improving it via the open-source ROCm platform. MI300X supports AMD’s ROCm 6, which provides libraries and framework support (PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX, ONNX Runtime, etc.) for developers (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator). Many common AI frameworks can run on MI300 with minimal code changes, especially if using AMD’s HIP APIs which mirror CUDA. AMD is also leveraging its strong presence in supercomputing to push ROCm’s capabilities. While NVIDIA still enjoys a larger developer base, AMD’s commitment to open standards and large memory may attract those working on cutting-edge models that need the memory headroom MI300 offers.
(Testing AMD’s Giant MI300X) Figure: AMD Instinct MI300X multi-die accelerator. The MI300X integrates 8 GPU chiplets (XCD) and 8 HBM3 stacks on one package, delivering 192 GB HBM3 with 5.3 TB/s bandwidth for demanding AI/HPC workloads (Testing AMD’s Giant MI300X). This massive on-chip memory lets MI300X handle very large models (tens of billions of parameters) on a single card, ideal for generative AI serving.
Intel Gaudi3 – Scaling AI Training with a Different Approach
Intel’s Gaudi3, developed by the Habana Labs team, is a third-generation AI accelerator that takes a unique path compared to GPU-based solutions. Gaudi3 is purpose-built for deep learning training (and inference) with an emphasis on scale-out architecture and cost-efficient performance. Each Gaudi3 chip features a dual-die design (two compute dies on one package) and is equipped with 128 GB of HBM2e memory at 3.7 TB/s bandwidth (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper). That is significantly more memory than a typical GPU like H100 (128GB vs 80GB), albeit slightly lower bandwidth than MI300X’s HBM3. Gaudi3’s compute prowess is on par with high-end GPUs: it delivers about 1.8 PFLOPs of BF16/FP8 matrix compute (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper) – roughly comparable to dense FP8 throughput on H100 (which is ~1.98 PFLOPs without sparsity) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). In fact, Gaudi3’s designers chose to make BF16 and FP8 have the same peak FLOPs, focusing the architecture squarely on AI math (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming …). This means Gaudi3 can natively train or infer with 8-bit precision for maximum speed, just like Hopper and MI300X.
Networking and Scalability: One of Gaudi3’s standout features is its integrated networking for scaling multiple accelerators. Each Gaudi3 includes 24× 200 Gbps RoCE (RDMA over Converged Ethernet) links built into the silicon (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper) (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper). In practical terms, that’s a total bi-directional bandwidth of 600 GB/s dedicated to inter-node communication (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming Higher In AI Market), enabling Gaudi3 chips to form large clusters using standard Ethernet switches. This approach differs from NVIDIA’s NVLink/NVSwitch – Gaudi3 essentially has Ethernet NICs on-chip, eliminating the need for separate InfiniBand adapters for multi-server training. The result is an architecture that can scale out almost linearly using commodity networking. For example, in AWS cloud (which adopted the earlier Gaudi2), users could link many Gaudi accelerators across nodes for distributed training without the proprietary interconnects. Intel claims that Gaudi3’s enhanced networking and memory capacity provide “an order-of-magnitude improvement in large language model inference performance” compared to Gaudi2 (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper) – largely because bigger models can be kept in memory and communication overhead is reduced.
Training Performance: Gaudi3 is aimed at high-efficiency training of neural networks, especially in cloud or enterprise settings where cost and scaling matter. On paper it offers 2× the FP16/BF16 throughput of Gaudi2 and 1.5× the memory bandwidth, so we can expect a healthy performance boost on big models (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper). Intel has indicated that on certain workloads, Gaudi3 outperforms NVIDIA’s H100 – reportedly up to 1.5× faster in training some models, though official benchmarks are limited (Intel revealed their new Gaudi 3 AI chip. They claim that it will be 50 …). What we do know is that Gaudi2 already demonstrated competitive performance to NVIDIA A100 in MLPerf (with significant cost advantages), and Gaudi3 leaps ahead of Gaudi2 with 5nm process, more engines, and higher clock. It contains 64 Tensor Processor Cores (TPCs) – highly programmable VLIW SIMD cores for tensor math – and 8 Matrix Engines (one per cluster) that accelerate GEMM operations (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming Higher In AI Market) (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming Higher In AI Market). These are backed by 96 MB of on-die SRAM for fast scratchpad memory ([PDF] Supermicro Gaudi 3 Complete Solution). Real-world uses of Gaudi have included training image classifiers, NLP models, and recommendation systems, often at lower cost per training run than GPUs. Gaudi3 aims to extend this to very large models: with 128GB memory per card, even models with over 100B parameters (in 8-bit precision) might fit on a few Gaudi3s.
Inference and Flexibility: While optimized for training, Gaudi3 also supports inference and other AI tasks. Its large memory and fast compute mean it can serve relatively large models on one card or do batch inference efficiently. For instance, Gaudi3 supports all the data types (FP32/TF32, FP16/BF16, INT8, FP8) needed for different inference scenarios (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). However, Gaudi’s real advantage in inference could be at scale: deploying a cluster of Gaudi3 accelerators for inference-as-a-service, taking advantage of the built-in 2D torus/mesh connectivity over Ethernet. This could simplify scaling out an inference service without custom interconnects. Still, as of now, NVIDIA’s TensorRT and software optimizations give GPUs an edge in per-card latency. Gaudi3’s success in inference will largely depend on how well the software (compilers, runtime) can optimize models on its architecture.
Software Ecosystem: Intel provides the Habana SynapseAI SDK (now just called the Gaudi software suite) for Gaudi3, which includes a graph compiler, kernel libraries, and developer tools (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card) (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). Importantly, it is integrated with popular ML frameworks – PyTorch has built-in Gaudi support, so models can train on Gaudi3 with minimal code changes (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). The Gaudi software stack supports TensorFlow as well, and common libraries (for ops, optimizers, etc.) are provided. Developers can use the same PyTorch scripts and simply choose Gaudi as the target device (much like selecting a CUDA device) (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). Intel also emphasizes an open ecosystem: models trained on GPUs can be migrated to Gaudi with little modification, and tools like Gaudi insights and profilers help fine-tune performance. While the community around Gaudi is smaller than CUDA’s, Intel’s strategy is to make adoption straightforward for AI practitioners. They even host a developer site with tutorials and forums for Gaudi users (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). In summary, Gaudi3 offers a compelling mix of high memory, strong compute, and built-in scalability, appealing to those who want alternatives to GPU clusters. Its success will hinge on the maturity of the software and demonstrated performance on real workloads, but it stands as an intriguing competitor in the AI training accelerator space.
Apple M3 – On-Device AI in a Consumer SoC
Apple’s M3 chip (and its higher-end variants M3 Pro, M3 Max, M3 Ultra) represents the cutting-edge of consumer-level AI silicon. While not a dedicated AI accelerator card, the M3 is a system-on-chip that integrates CPU, GPU, and a specialized Neural Engine (NPU), all designed with machine learning in mind. The M3 family is built on a 3nm process and introduces architectural improvements over the M1/M2 series, bringing significant boosts to graphics and neural processing. Notably, the Neural Engine in M3 is up to 60% faster than that of the M1 generation (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com). This means tasks like image recognition, video analysis, or natural language processing on the Mac run markedly quicker, all while keeping data on the device (benefiting privacy). In practical use, Apple reports that ML-powered features in pro apps see major speedups – for example, noise reduction and super-resolution in Topaz Labs software, or scene edit detection in Adobe Premiere Pro execute much faster on M3 than on M1 machines (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com) (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com). These are real workflows where the Neural Engine and GPU work together to accelerate creative tasks with AI.
Unified Memory for AI: One of Apple’s biggest advantages is the unified memory architecture (UMA) used in M-series chips. All parts of the chip (CPU, GPU, Neural Engine) share a common pool of fast memory, rather than having separate VRAM. The new M3 Ultra, for instance, supports up to 512 GB of unified memory with 800 GB/s bandwidth (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple) (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple) – an astonishing amount for a personal computer. This large memory opens the door for running AI models that previously were infeasible on a desktop. Apple even stated that AI developers can run LLMs with over 600 billion parameters directly on a Mac Studio with M3 Ultra (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple) (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple) (presumably using optimized 4-bit quantization to fit such a model in 512GB). While that is an extreme case, it signals Apple’s intent to make Macs capable of serious AI development. Even the laptop-class M3 Max supports up to 128GB RAM, which Apple notes can accommodate “even larger transformer models with billions of parameters” for on-the-go AI workflows (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com). In essence, Apple is bringing some of the capabilities of data-center AI to personal devices, enabling use cases like running a GPT-style model locally for coding assistance, image generation, or other generative tasks without a cloud service.
Neural Engine and GPU: The 32-core Neural Engine in M3 Ultra (16-core in M3/M3 Pro/Max) performs AI-specific computations (matrix multiplies, convolution, etc.) extremely efficiently, reaching 15–20 trillion operations per second (estimated) in the base M3 and double that in Ultra. This NPU handles many Core ML tasks – from accelerating Siri’s speech recognition to powering features like on-device facial recognition in Photos. Developers can target the Neural Engine via Apple’s Core ML framework to offload parts of their models. Additionally, the GPU in M3 got a major redesign with features like Dynamic Caching (allocating on-chip memory on the fly) and hardware ray tracing support (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com) (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com). While ray tracing benefits graphics, Dynamic Caching improves ML model execution on the GPU by utilizing memory more efficiently. The M3 Max/Ultra GPUs are quite powerful (80-core GPU in Ultra with up to 2× M2 Ultra’s performance) and can be used for neural network tasks via Metal Performance Shaders (MPS) and frameworks like TensorFlow/PyTorch (which now have Apple GPU backends). In fact, many developers use the M-series GPU for training moderate-sized models or fine-tuning, achieving results comparable to mid-range discrete GPUs but with far lower power draw.
AI on Device: The key role of Apple’s M3 in AI is to enable advanced ML and AI applications on laptops and desktops that traditionally might require a server or cloud backend. For instance, with M3, Apple demonstrated features like personal voice generation (an accessibility feature that uses AI to clone a voice) and running stable diffusion image generation in seconds. The latency for inference on M3 is low enough for real-time applications – e.g., a music app can use the Neural Engine to separate vocals from a song on the fly, or an imaging app can do instant background removal. Many iOS apps that use Core ML can now run the same models on Mac locally. Compared to enterprise chips, the M3 is obviously limited in absolute performance (it won’t train a 70B model in any reasonable time), but it excels in efficiency: Apple notes the M3 GPU can match an M1’s performance at half the power, and reach 65% higher peak performance within a laptop thermal envelope (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com). The M3 family’s focus is versatility and integration – by having CPU, GPU, NPU, and media engines on one chip, it can handle complex AI-driven workflows end-to-end. The supported software ecosystem includes Apple’s Core ML tools for model conversion and optimization, an expanding set of GPU-optimized libraries, and developer APIs to tap into the Neural Engine. This ecosystem, while more niche than CUDA, is steadily growing – for example, PyTorch 2.0 introduced an MPS backend allowing many PyTorch models to run on the Mac GPU with little change.
In summary, Apple’s M3 showcases how AI processing improvements are not confined to big server chips. It brings features like massive memory, fast matrix compute, and optimized memory usage into consumer devices. Real-world examples include generative AI art, real-time video effects, and personal ML models running locally. This empowers developers to prototype and deploy certain AI models on-device, and users to benefit from AI features without extra hardware. The M3 may not compete with an H100 on MLPerf, but in the context of personal computing, it is transformative for AI workloads at home or on the go.
(Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple) Figure: On-device AI in action – a developer using a Mac Studio with M3 Ultra for machine learning workflows. Apple’s M3 chips integrate a fast Neural Engine and powerful GPU with up to 800 GB/s unified memory, enabling tasks like image generation, video editing with AI effects, and even running large language models locally (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple) (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com).
Comparing Key Metrics and Strengths
Now that we’ve profiled each chip, let’s compare how they stack up in key areas:
Model Training Performance
When it comes to training AI models, NVIDIA’s H100 currently sets the pace in most benchmarks – it has demonstrated top training speeds on everything from vision models to large language models. Its combination of high compute throughput and software maturity means many existing models can reach peak hardware performance on H100. AMD’s MI300X, however, is designed to challenge this supremacy. With higher theoretical TFLOPs in 8-bit and more memory per GPU, MI300X can train larger models on a single device and may excel at memory-bound training tasks (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). In scenarios where batch size or model size is limited by GPU memory (common in large NLP models), MI300X could out-train H100 by reducing the need for data parallelism (e.g. fitting a 70B model on one MI300X vs needing 2× H100s). Intel Gaudi3 focuses on training efficiency: its strength is evident when scaling out. For small-scale training (single card), Gaudi3 is powerful but may not outperform an H100 unless the model is optimized for Gaudi’s architecture. However, in a cluster setting, Gaudi3’s built-in Ethernet fabric enables excellent scaling – adding more Gaudi3 nodes can increase training throughput nearly linearly in some cases, thanks to the 24×200Gb links (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper) (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). This gives Gaudi3 an edge for cost-sensitive training at scale (for example, cloud providers could use many Gaudi3 accelerators to train a model at lower cost than the equivalent H100 cluster, even if each Gaudi3 is slightly slower). Apple’s M3, by contrast, is not intended for training giant models. Its training strength lies in smaller-scale or fine-tuning tasks – such as training a custom image classifier, performing transfer learning on a moderate dataset, or experimenting with models up to a few hundred million parameters. Within that domain, the M3’s Neural Engine and GPU can train models reasonably fast (often faster than a power-hungry GPU from a few years ago), all on a laptop or desktop. In short, for industrial-scale training (billion-parameter models, huge datasets), H100 and MI300X (and to a lesser extent Gaudi3) are the tools of choice, whereas for personalized model training and prototyping, the Apple M3 puts surprising capability in a developer’s hands.
Inference Latency and Throughput
Inference – using trained models to make predictions – has somewhat different requirements. NVIDIA H100 is heavily optimized for low latency inference. Its TensorRT and CUDA software stack allows for techniques like engine autotuning, quantization, and batch scheduling that minimize latency. As a result, H100 can serve models like GPT-3 or ResNet with very low response times, especially when using FP8 or INT8 modes. NVIDIA demonstrated that an 8× H100 server can handle an LLM inference in under 2 seconds with batch-1 (no queueing) (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog), which is critical for real-time applications. Furthermore, with slight latency allowance (e.g. 2.5s deadline), that same server processed 5× more queries per second by smart batching (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog). AMD MI300X is expected to deliver strong throughput, particularly for large-model inference. Its large memory means models don’t need to be sharded, simplifying inference pipelines for things like 100B+ parameter transformers. We might see MI300X shine in multi-stream throughput – for instance, serving multiple concurrent GPT instances from one card, each with ample memory. The latency on MI300X could be very competitive if the model fits entirely in its HBM (which avoids PCIe transfers or host memory paging). We saw AMD claim in their materials that MI300X can achieve high inference performance on Llama-2 70B (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog), though NVIDIA countered the exact numbers, it’s clear MI300X is in the top tier for inference as well. Intel Gaudi3 targets inference mainly as an extension of its training capabilities. With 128GB memory, Gaudi3 can also hold large models (though not as large as MI300X can). The unique value for inference is Gaudi3’s ability to scale-out the service. If you need to deploy an AI model across a cluster for higher throughput, Gaudi3’s Ethernet fabric allows direct communication between accelerators, potentially enabling methods like distributed batch processing or model parallel inference across cards with less overhead. That said, Gaudi3 is a newer entrant and its inference-optimized libraries (analogous to TensorRT) are still maturing. For now, one might expect Gaudi3’s per-card latency to be slightly higher than H100’s on identical models, simply due to software differences. But for throughput at scale (many queries in parallel), Gaudi3 could be very effective. Apple M3 is at the opposite end: it excels in real-time, on-device inference for everyday AI tasks. Its latency for things like photo analysis, Siri voice recognition, or augmented reality is extremely low because everything is local and optimized in silicon. The M3 can run a Transformer-based language model with a few billion parameters on-device and give near-instant responses – something impossible on prior generation laptops. However, for very large models or massive throughput (say, a web service handling thousands of queries per second), the M3 is not intended for that – those remain the domain of data center accelerators. In summary, H100 currently leads in lowest latency, MI300X in model capacity per inference instance, Gaudi3 in scalable throughput via clustering, and Apple M3 in enabling personal, instant AI inference without server access.
Memory Bandwidth and Compute Power
These chips take different approaches to memory and compute trade-offs. On raw memory bandwidth, AMD MI300X is king with 5.3 TB/s from its HBM3 stacks (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator). This is about 1.5–1.8× the bandwidth of an H100 (SXM) at ~3.0–3.35 TB/s (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). Intel Gaudi3 comes in around 3.7 TB/s (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper), using slightly older HBM2e technology but a wider bus (Gaudi3 has 8 HBM2e stacks at 4096-bit each, clocked high) (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming Higher In AI Market) (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming Higher In AI Market). NVIDIA H100 with HBM3 hits ~3 TB/s (SXM5 version), or ~2 TB/s in the PCIe version with HBM2e (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog). In terms of memory capacity: MI300X 192GB >> Gaudi3 128GB > H100 80GB. This influences how large a model or batch each can accommodate; MI300X simply allows much larger single-GPU models or batch sizes, which can improve utilization for certain workloads. Apple M3 Ultra, although far behind in absolute bandwidth (≈0.8 TB/s unified memory) (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple), is exceptional in the consumer space and offers up to 512GB shared memory – more than even H100’s 80GB (albeit far slower memory). For Apple’s typical workloads (which often stream data from SSD or network), 800 GB/s unified is plenty, but in pure number, it’s about 1/6th of H100’s bandwidth.
Compute-wise, NVIDIA H100 Tensor cores deliver about 990 TFLOPs FP16 (dense) and up to 1.98 PFLOPs with sparsity (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). For INT8/FP8, H100 reaches nearly 4 PFLOPs (dense) or ~4.9–7.9 PFLOPs with sparsity (the exact numbers vary with how NVIDIA counts Transformer Engine results) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). AMD MI300X is rated ~1.3 PFLOPs FP16 dense, 2.6 PFLOPs FP16 with sparsity, and a huge 5.2 PFLOPs FP8 with sparsity (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators). So MI300X appears to have slightly higher peak math throughput at low precision, thanks to its many compute CUs and high clocks. Intel Gaudi3 lists 1.835 PFLOPs BF16 (which equals its FP8, since those share the same pipeline in Gaudi) (Intel Introduces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator: Going Bigger and Aiming Higher In AI Market). So Gaudi3 is in the same ballpark, maybe a bit lower than H100/MI300 in peaks. But Gaudi’s architecture might sustain utilization differently (it has lots of VLIW cores rather than massive monolithic SMs). Apple M3 doesn’t have official TFLOP numbers for neural ops – the GPU is around 30 TFLOPs FP32 (for M3 Ultra’s 80-core GPU). The 32-core Neural Engine roughly does 18 TOPS (trillion ops) per second in M1, and if 60% faster in M3, that’s ~29 TOPS per 16-core NPU, or ~58 TOPS for the 32-core in M3 Ultra (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com). These are INT8 operations typically. So, relative to the big guys, Apple’s AI compute is tiny – but it’s also more targeted (and ridiculously energy-efficient for what it does). The takeaway is: H100 and MI300X have the most brute-force compute and bandwidth, Gaudi3 is close behind with a balanced approach, and Apple M3 trades off raw power for integration and efficiency.
Supported Software Ecosystems
The software ecosystem can make or break an AI chip’s usefulness:
- NVIDIA (H100) – Arguably the most mature and developer-friendly ecosystem. Developers use CUDA, which has extensive support in all major ML frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX, MXNet, etc.). NVIDIA provides a full stack: cuDNN for deep learning primitives, cuBLAS for linear algebra, TensorRT for optimized inference, and higher-level frameworks like NeMo for LLMs. This means models often run on NVIDIA GPUs out-of-the-box with excellent performance. Moreover, the community has built countless CUDA-optimized libraries. For deployment, tools like NVIDIA Triton Inference Server ease multi-model serving. Simply put, NVIDIA’s ecosystem is the gold standard, honed over a decade, which is a major strength of the H100 beyond its hardware.
- AMD (MI300) – AMD’s ROCm software platform is the equivalent to CUDA. It’s an open-source stack that includes the HIP API (allowing CUDA code to be ported with minimal changes), optimized math libraries (rocBLAS, MIOpen for DL, etc.), and framework plugins. In recent ROCm releases, PyTorch and TensorFlow can run on AMD Instinct GPUs fairly seamlessly for many models (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator). However, certain cutting-edge research models or niche ops might still have better support on CUDA first. AMD is actively working with partners (like PyTorch’s developer team and major cloud providers) to improve this. With MI300, AMD will likely push optimizations for transformer models, given the target use (they already enabled features like FP8 support and large model tuning in ROCm 5/6). The ecosystem for AMD is improving steadily, but developers may need to ensure their training code or model kernels are supported/optimized for ROCm – otherwise, performance could lag until patches arrive. The openness of ROCm is attractive for researchers who want to see and tweak the lower-level implementation, and for HPC centers that prefer open solutions.
- Intel (Gaudi3) – Intel’s Habana Gaudi software (SynapseAI) comes with integrations primarily for PyTorch (and also TensorFlow). Many common models (ResNet, BERT, etc.) have reference Gaudi implementations or examples. The Gaudi compiler will take models in PyTorch and attempt to optimize execution across the TPCs and MMEs. There might be some manual optimization needed for best performance (such as choosing optimal batch sizes or fusing certain ops). Intel also provides profiling tools and even a software emulator for Gaudi to test compatibility. One advantage is that Gaudi’s software is designed to make switching from GPU to Gaudi easy – for example, the developer can install a custom PyTorch build that supports Gaudi, and then just by setting the device to “hpu” (Habana Processing Unit), run their training script on Gaudi hardware (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). Inference deployment on Gaudi can use the same graph compiler to optimize the model. The ecosystem is not as extensive as CUDA (Habana is relatively new), but being under Intel, Gaudi is now getting more resources and a growing user community (notably via AWS Habana instances). Intel’s approach is to integrate with standard tools rather than force new ones: e.g., use standard PyTorch, use Ethernet networking with standard protocols, etc., so that adopting Gaudi feels familiar to developers. Over time, if Gaudi3 shows strong performance, its ecosystem will likely flourish as more projects adapt to it.
- Apple (M3) – Apple’s ecosystem for AI is quite different, targeting mobile and desktop developers. It revolves around Core ML, Apple’s machine learning framework, which allows developers to convert models (from TensorFlow, PyTorch, etc.) into a format optimized for Apple’s Neural Engine and GPU. Core ML will automatically decide whether to run a model on the CPU, GPU, or Neural Engine based on what is available and the model’s layers. Developers who want more control can use Metal Performance Shaders (MPS), which is a low-level API to use the GPU for tensor operations (recently used as the backend for PyTorch on Mac). With PyTorch 2.x, you can actually select the “mps” device, and many models will train or infer on the Mac’s GPU – this is a huge step forward that arrived during the M1/M2 era and continues improving. The Neural Engine is not directly accessible in user code except via Core ML or Accelerate framework calls, but some specialized tasks (e.g., using Apple’s Vision framework) implicitly use it. In summary, Apple’s AI software stack is geared toward enabling ML in apps (for things like image processing, Siri, keyboard suggestions, etc.) and for developers to prototype models on Mac. It’s not aimed at competing with CUDA in the data-center sense, but it’s quite powerful within its domain. A lot of popular ML tools now have Apple support – e.g., TensorFlow has a Mac fork that can use M1/M2, Jupyter notebooks can run Swift for TensorFlow or use coremltools to deploy models, and so on. The ecosystem is less about highest performance and more about seamless integration into Apple’s software development environment (Xcode, Swift, etc.). As AI moves toward edge devices, Apple’s stack might influence how models are designed (e.g., optimizing for 16-core Neural Engine execution).
Summing Up the Comparison
Each chip brings something unique: NVIDIA H100 offers the fastest all-around performance and a time-tested software stack – it’s the safe bet for maximum performance if cost is no issue. AMD MI300X provides unrivaled memory capacity on a single accelerator, potentially reducing complexity for training or serving huge models, and it leverages an open ecosystem appealing to those who want alternatives to NVIDIA. Intel Gaudi3 presents an interesting value proposition for scale-out training, with lots of memory and networking built in – it’s a sign that the AI acceleration space is diversifying, giving big cloud players options beyond GPUs (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card) (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card). And on the consumer front, Apple M3 demonstrates how AI acceleration is becoming a staple in general-purpose chips, enabling new experiences and development workflows on personal devices (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com) (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple).
Conclusion
The rapid advancement in AI chips – from monster 700W GPUs in cloud servers to energy-efficient SoCs in your laptop – is a testament to the importance of machine learning across the industry. NVIDIA’s H100, AMD’s MI300X, Intel’s Gaudi3, and Apple’s M3 each target different needs, but together they paint a picture of the future: specialized hardware at every tier to run increasingly sophisticated AI models. For a developer or tech enthusiast, understanding these chips helps in choosing the right tool for the job. Need to train a 100B-parameter model as fast as possible? A cluster of H100s or MI300Xs is your go-to. Want to experiment with AI without a server? Apple’s latest Macs can get you surprisingly far. And if you’re exploring cost-effective training at scale, emerging platforms like Gaudi3 show there is innovation beyond the GPU incumbents.
One common theme is that memory is becoming as crucial as compute – large AI models demand immense memory bandwidth and capacity, which is why we see HBM memory on almost all high-end chips (and unified memory on Apple’s side) (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator). Another theme is the importance of software: the best hardware can fall short without optimized kernels and developer-friendly tools, so ecosystems like CUDA, ROCm, SynapseAI, and Core ML are integral to a chip’s success. Fortunately, current trends show these ecosystems maturing and even converging in terms of framework support.
As AI continues to evolve (with models growing and new applications emerging), we can expect the next generations – NVIDIA’s Blackwell, AMD’s further Instinct chips, Intel’s future Gaudi or perhaps Ponte Vecchio, and Apple’s M4 – to push boundaries even further. For now, the NVIDIA H100, AMD MI300X, Intel Gaudi3, and Apple M3 represent state-of-the-art chips driving the AI revolution, each excelling in its domain: from cloud datacenters training gigantic neural networks to ultra-portable devices bringing AI to your fingertips.
Sources: The information and data above were gathered from official technical specifications, benchmark results, and credible industry analyses, including NVIDIA’s and AMD’s product datasheets and blogs (for specs like memory bandwidth and TFLOPs) (NVIDIA Hopper Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (AMD Instinct MI300X Accelerator), performance showcases by NVIDIA (MLPerf training and LLM inference numbers) (Breaking MLPerf Training Records with NVIDIA H100 GPUs | NVIDIA Technical Blog) (Achieving Top Inference Performance with the NVIDIA H100 Tensor Core GPU and NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM | NVIDIA Technical Blog), AMD’s MI300X briefing (memory and model capacity claims) (AMD Instinct™ MI300 Series Accelerators), Intel’s Gaudi3 whitepaper (architectural details and performance targets) (Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator White Paper) (Product Brief: Intel® Gaudi® 3 AI Accelerator HL-338 PCie Add-in Card), and Apple’s announcements (Neural Engine improvements and unified memory capabilities) (Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max processors – MacTech.com) (Apple reveals M3 Ultra, taking Apple silicon to a new extreme – Apple). Each of these chips is backed by years of R&D, and their real-world performance will continue to be refined as software stacks improve and new benchmarks emerge. The competition between them ultimately benefits the AI community by driving rapid improvements – giving us faster training times, lower inference latencies, and more accessible AI computing than ever before. Keywords: Comparison of the Latest AI Chips.
At Dolphin Studios, we can help you optimize your LLMs to run the best that they can – context output, full stack engineering, and better, more efficient models. Contact us to learn more about our services.